CaseCraft.ai Casesraft.ai
We’re Live – Start Your Claim Today with CaseCraft.AI 🚀

Construction Defect Claim: Understanding Your Rights and Options

Construction defect claim issues are a common source of disputes in building projects. These claims arise when work on a construction project is found to be defective, meaning it doesn’t meet the required standards or specifications. In simple terms, what is a construction defect claim? It’s a legal claim made to address faults or deficiencies in construction work, whether due to poor workmanship, subpar materials, or design errors. 

Get started Today

The goal is to enable the responsible party to be held accountable, either to rectify the problem or compensate for the damage. With CaseCraft AI, individuals and small businesses across the UK can take action through the small claims process without needing legal expertise or expensive help. CaseCraft currently supports claims up to £10,000. You can check the Money Claims Map to see what types of cases are covered.

How are Defects Legally Defined?

There’s no single legal definition of a defect. But in most cases, a defect means something in the work that isn’t up to the agreed standard. It could be a contract breach, use of poor materials, or work that leaves the building unsafe or less functional.

If it causes damage, risk, or limits usability, it may be considered a defect, regardless of size.

Defects usually fall into one or more of these areas:

  • Workmanship – like uneven floors or poorly installed fittings
  • Materials – such as faulty pipes or low-grade bricks
  • Design – where the plans were wrong or caused problems during use

How Do Latent and Patent Defects Differ?

In UK construction law, defects are usually classified as either patent or latent. This distinction plays a crucial role in any construction defect claim; it affects various aspects of the case, including legal responsibility and the time limits for taking action.

  1. Patent defects are visible issues (like cracks or misaligned fittings) that should be reported quickly. If not fixed within contract terms, they may be treated as a breach.
  2. Latent defects are hidden issues, such as internal leaks or structural faults, that often appear years after completion, typically after the defect liability period has ended. 

Who Can Be Held Liable in a Construction Defect Claim?

In any construction defect claim, identifying who is legally responsible is key. Liability depends on the defect’s cause, contract terms, and project setup. Multiple parties may share blame. Below are the main roles typically involved in defective building work claims.

1. Contractors and Builders

The contractor is typically held liable in a construction defect claim when the issue stems from defective building work, such as poor workmanship, improper materials, or failure to meet the contract terms.

2. Architects and Designers

If the problem lies in the design itself, such as structural faults or layout issues, the architect or engineer may be liable. Errors that cause damage or extra costs can make them accountable.

3. Subcontractors

Subcontractors, such as electricians or plumbers, may be liable if their work causes a defect.

4. Product Manufacturers and Suppliers

If the defect stems from a faulty product, such as weak bricks, poor insulation panels, or damaged windows, then the supplier or manufacturer could be responsible under product liability rules or warranties.

Defect Claims Dispute Resolution Methods in Construction

In the UK, resolving a construction defect claim typically starts with contractual remedies and may escalate to formal dispute resolution:

  • Contractual Remedies: Most contracts have a Defects Liability Period (6–12 months post-completion), during which contractors must fix issues at their own cost.
  • Negotiation: If damage appears after the DLP or goes unaddressed, direct negotiation is often the first step.
  • Adjudication: If talks fail, a 28-day adjudication process under UK law offers a binding, fast-track decision.
  • Mediation: A neutral third party helps reach a non-binding agreement, useful for preserving a good relation between the parties.
  • Arbitration: Common in complex or international cases, arbitration leads to a binding decision from a chosen arbitrator.
  • Litigation: Used as a last resort, serious claims are usually heard in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC).

What is the Best Alternative Dispute Resolution?

When dealing with a construction defect, your resolution options depend on the issue’s severity and the other party’s cooperation:

  • Request Repairs or Negotiate: Inform the contractor of the defect. If it’s within a warranty or defects liability period, they may agree to fix it or offer compensation.
  • Mediation or Expert Opinion: If talks stall, mediation provides a quick, confidential way to settle. A neutral party helps both sides reach a deal.
  • Adjudication: Most UK construction contracts allow for a 28-day adjudication process where an independent adjudicator decides liability and next steps.
  • Small Claims Court or Legal Action: For claims, use the small claims court. Larger cases may need formal litigation and follow the Pre-Action Protocols.
  • Arbitration: If your contract has an arbitration clause, disputes must be settled through a binding private process.

Construction Defects: Common Lawsuits and Defenses

In any construction defect claim, the other party may try to limit or avoid liability. Here are the main defenses you might face:

  • “No Breach”: The contractor may claim the work meets contract standards or that the issue isn’t a defect.
  • No Notice / No Chance to Fix: You didn’t report the damage or let them fix it, breaching contract terms.
  • Contributory Fault by Others: Fault may be shifted to subcontractors, designers, or the owner.
  • Expired Time Limit: Claims filed too late can be dismissed, even if valid.
  • Betterment or Overstated Claim: A contractor might argue that your repair costs go beyond what’s reasonable.
  • Acceptance of Work: If you signed off or raised no issues, they may argue you waived your right to claim.

To counter these defenses, it’s important to act early and stay organized. CaseCraft AI helps you prepare your construction defect claim by guiding you through the required documents and claim steps, so you’re better equipped to present your case clearly.

Construction Defect Claim Timeline and Project Impact

How long a claim takes depends on the dispute’s complexity and resolution method. Here’s a quick look at typical timelines and project impact:

Faster Outcomes (Weeks to Months):

  • Repairs or Settlement: If the contractor agrees to fix the issue or offer compensation, it can be resolved in weeks.
  • Adjudication: A fast-track process, typically resolved within 28 days.
  • Mediation: Informal and often resolved in under a month. These methods minimize delays and keep the project moving.

Contested Claims (Months to Over a Year):

  • Court Proceedings: Small claims take 3–6 months; larger cases may last over a year.
  • Arbitration: Common but slower and more costly.
  • Enforcement: If the other party doesn’t comply, collecting damages can take longer.

Deadline for Filing a Construction Defect Claim

In the UK, you must bring a construction defect claim within specific legal timeframes, called limitation periods. These deadlines depend on the type of claim and the legal path you choose.

Contract Claims (England, Wales & Northern Ireland):

  • Standard contracts: 6 years from completion.
  • Contracts as deeds: 12 years.

These apply even if the defect is discovered later.

Negligence-Based Claims:

  • 3 years from discovery (or reasonable awareness), with a 15-year limit from the act of negligence.

Defective Premises Act (England & Wales):

If a home is unfit for habitation due to defective building work:

  • 15 years for new homes.
  • Up to 30 years for some older claims under the Building Safety Act 2022.

Scotland:

  • 5 years from discovery, capped at 20 years from when the work was done.

Contract-Specific Limits

  • Some contracts set shorter deadlines (e.g., tied to the defects liability period). Missing these may prevent a claim; always check your contract.

Outcome of a Successful Construction Defect Claim

Winning a construction defect claim typically leads to one of two outcomes: financial compensation or a repair order. The goal is to put you back in the position you would’ve been in if the defect hadn’t occurred. After winning, the other side is expected to pay the amount or perform the required fix by the deadline set in the judgment.

For small claims in England, Wales, Scotland, or Northern Ireland, CaseCraft AI offers a practical way to file and manage your claim. The platform simplifies each step, from creating documentation to understanding legal procedures, reducing the burden while boosting your chances of success. Need help getting started? CaseCraft supports small claims up to £10,000 across the UK. Use the CaseCraft AI eligibility checker in seconds.

Note: CaseCraft AI does not provide legal advice. This page is for informational purposes only.

Case studies

Success stories

"CaseCraft AI will change the industry — it puts power back in the hands of individuals. No more costly lawyers or confusing paperwork. It’s fast, fair, and incredibly user-friendly."
Jessica H.

Tested by Sterling Law

“Really impressed with how smooth the system is. The interface is clean, and it just makes handling cases feel effortless. Everything is where you need it, without any unnecessary steps.”
Daniel K.

Tested by Sterling Law

“The platform is incredibly intuitive. I was able to start using it without any complicated training, and it’s made organising case documents much simpler.”
Edward M.

Tested by Sterling Law

CaseCraft AI is an advanced platform designed to simplify the small claims application process. We use cutting-edge AI technology to automate critical tasks such as document preparation, case tracking, and compliance management, ensuring efficiency and accuracy at every step. Whether you’re filing or responding to a claim, CaseCraft AI streamlines the process for greater accuracy and efficiency.

CaseCraft AI can handle a wide range of small claims, including unpaid debts, contract disputes, service agreement disputes, and property damage claims. The platform includes an eligibility check that guides you through the process, ensuring your claim meets the necessary legal requirements.

Yes, security is a top priority. We use enterprise-grade encryption and comply with UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 to ensure the confidentiality and security of all user data. Regular security audits and access controls further protect sensitive information.

AI-powered platform

Don’t Wait – Get
Started Today!

Take the first step toward a faster, easier small claims process with CaseCraft.AI.

Start Your Claim Now
Co-founder

Alexander Mints

Finance, operations and product development

Alexander has made significant contributions to the field of investment management, notably through his role in establishing EG Capital Advisors and spearheading its Emerging Markets Corporate High Yield investment strategy from its inception. His career is marked by a deep understanding of credit analysis, risk evaluation, and a hands-on approach to investment management, honed through extensive experience in the industry.

Previously holding key roles in reputable financial institutions, Alexander served as the Head of Analytics and Portfolio Manager at Alfa Capital’s Multi-Family Office Department. There, he applied his skills and comprehensive market knowledge to manage portfolios effectively, ensuring client satisfaction and investment success.

His career journey also includes a tenure at SDM Bank, where he worked as an Economist and Financial Supervision Specialist in the Risk Assessment Group.

Co-founder

Mikhail Yatsuha

Legal research and product development

Michael, a partner at, a Legal 500 law firm, Sterling Law and co-founder of AQLO, brings his expertise in civil litigation, corporate and commercial law to the forefront of legal technology and innovation.

His experience at Sterling Law, where he navigated clients through the complexities of litigation, is invaluable in informing the development and functionality of CaseCraft AI. Michael’s practical approach to legal challenges, focused on efficient and client-friendly solutions, is embedded into the core of CaseCraft AI, ensuring users receive not just technological convenience but also legally sound guidance.

Similarly, his involvement in AQLO, a testament to his innovative spirit and tech-forward thinking, complements his work at CaseCraft AI. His ability to merge legal proficiency with technological advancement is a cornerstone of his contribution to CaseCraft AI, making the platform a pioneering tool in legal tech.

Co-founder

Dmitry Bagrov

Technology oversight

Dmitry Bagrov led the establishment of DataArt UK and currently oversees all aspects of its operations, from sales to production and HR management.

In his time as a Managing Director, Dmitry has built DataArt UK into a fully-staffed provider of end-to-end solutions and has brought annual revenue from $2.4 million in 2009 to over $110 million in 2023. He has led teams to gain a range of clients, including Flutter, Apax Partners, Trainline, Coller Capital, Ocado Technology, British Gas, major UK banks and financial services firms.

With over thirty years’ experience across product and service development, delivery, sales and management, Dmitry’s 24 years with DataArt followed roles of project manager and developer in other companies.

Dmitry is a regular media commentator on business technology issues, such as digital strategy, digital transformation, innovation, and has been quoted in The Financial Times, The Times, The Guardian, TechWeekEurope, Vanilla+, Forbes, BBC and numerous other news outlets.

Dmitry holds an MBA from London Cass Business School.

Co-founder

Ruslan Kosarenko

Legal research, PR and marketing

Ruslan Kosarenko is a renowned UK immigration lawyer and Partner, recognized by Legal 500. He manages a team of 40 lawyers and is a visionary in immigration law, co-founding several platforms that are transforming the immigration process. These include Emigral, an immigration tech platform; AQLO, a legal and accounting tech platform for startups; talentvisa.uk, an immigration tech platform for talented individuals; Bug Free Immigration, an immigration and recruitment platform for high-ranking IT professionals; and the London Business Club.

As the Head of Immigration at Sterling Law, he has co-founded platforms like “Emigral” and “Talentvisa” revolutionizing the UK immigration process. His expertise covers High Net Worth applications, extradition, and human rights applications. He is known for being a ‘strategic problem solver.’

Ruslan has a strong commitment to integrating technology into immigration services, evident in his partnership with EMIGRAL.UK, focusing on AI-enhanced solutions to streamline the immigration process. His legal acumen is also demonstrated in significant cases like R (on the Application of Franco) v SSHD.

Advisor

Ed Crosse

Ed Crosse is a Commercial Disputes Partner at Simmons & Simmons LLP and a CEDR Accredited Mediator, with over 30 years’ experience representing clients across a wide range of sectors including Wholesale and Private Banking, Wealth Management, AMIF, Real Estate Finance, Health & Life Sciences, Defence, and Aviation. He has particular expertise in commercial and civil fraud claims arising from or into the UAE, Switzerland, and CIS countries. Ed is frequently instructed to conduct internal investigations involving financial services regulation and suspected corrupt payments.

Renowned for his meticulous and unrelenting approach to litigation, Ed is regarded as a “leave no stone unturned” advocate. He is known for his strategic, considered style—choosing precision over aggression and bringing clarity to complex disputes.

Ed has played a leading role in shaping litigation practice in England and Wales. As President of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) in 2016, he helped drive significant civil procedure reforms in the Business and Property Courts, including the Shorter and Flexible Trials Scheme (STS) and the Disclosure Pilot (now Practice Direction 57AD). In 2018, he was elected to the Council of the Law Society of England & Wales representing the City of London and serves on the City of London Law Society committee. He is a respected speaker and chair at legal industry events, regularly addressing both technical and strategic topics.

Recognised as a Tier 1 “Leading Partner” in Civil Fraud, Ed has been described by legal directories as “a star litigator”, “client-focused”, and “a highly experienced litigator with great judgement, who combines excellent knowledge of the law with a real understanding of the commercial drivers of cases.”

Ed qualified as a solicitor in 1997, having trained at Clifford Chance and practiced at a leading City firm before joining his current firm in 2012.

At CaseCraft.AI, Ed serves as a trusted Advisor, contributing across several critical areas:

  • Strategic Guidance: Providing expert advice on legal strategy to ensure the platform aligns with current legal standards and best practices.

  • Industry Insights: Offering a deep understanding of legal market trends, challenges, and opportunities to guide product development and positioning.

  • Network Expansion: Introducing CaseCraft.AI to key stakeholders, partners, and clients within the legal ecosystem.

  • Product Evaluation: Delivering thoughtful, practical feedback on the platform’s capabilities, identifying areas for refinement and innovation.

  • Mentorship: Supporting the founding team with seasoned insight, helping them navigate the legal tech landscape with clarity and confidence.

Lead Solicitor

Edward Meade

A dynamic and enthusiastic accredited immigration solicitor with over four years’ experience in Immigration and Human Rights, and Employment law. Dedicated immigration specialist who offers compassionate representation to individuals whom require advice.

Edward has undertaken external exams with the Central Law Training – Organisation which is endorsed by the Law Society and SRA as an independent Immigration examination body which regulates those undertaking legal aid work in the United Kingdom. Edward has successfully passed Level 1 Immigration and Asylum Accreditation Scheme, and currently working towards passing his Level 2 examination in the Immigration and Asylum Accreditation Scheme.