CaseCraft.ai Casesraft.ai
Register for Early Access – Launching in Mid-2025!

How to Take a Car Dealership to Court: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide

Wondering, Can I take a car dealership to small claims court?” This step-by-step guide will help you determine whether your case can go to small claims court or if you’ll need a lawyer to bring the case for you in a different court track. Many small claims against car dealerships can be filed online without legal representation, and that’s where CaseCraft.AI comes in. Our secure, user-friendly platform makes it easier to file your case, submit evidence, receive court notices, and track your claim from start to finish. We’re with you every step of the way to help you seek the compensation you deserve.

Get started Today

Common Reasons to Take a Car Dealership to Court

There are several common reasons why people take a car dealer to small claims court. These include:

  • Purchasing a new or used car that develops a fault within 30 days, and the dealership denying your right to return it under the Consumer Rights Act (CRA).
  • Experiencing a vehicle fault within six months of purchase, and the dealer refusing to offer a repair or refund, as required by the CRA.
  • The dealer carrying out repairs that are substandard, unfinished, or unreasonably delayed within six months of purchase.
  • Being involved in an accident caused by a defect the dealership should have identified and addressed before the vehicle was handed over.

If you’re claiming more than £10,000 or dealing with a particularly complex issue, such as a faulty vehicle involved in a serious accident, you won’t be able to use the small claims court. In these situations, the legal process can be more complicated. If you’re unsure whether you can take a car dealership to small claims court, it’s a good idea to speak with a specialist solicitor who can guide you on the best course of action.

Assessing Whether You Have a Strong Case

Bought a new or used car from a dealer recently? If a fault is discovered within six months of purchase, the law presumes the issue existed at the time of sale. Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, the dealer is legally required to repair the fault at no extra cost or to allow you to return the car for a full refund if the fault is discovered and reported within 30 days of purchase. 

If you’re considering a compensation claim, arranging an independent vehicle inspection from a qualified mechanic can strengthen your case by establishing the severity of the fault and how long it’s been present. This report can serve as valuable evidence if negotiations with the dealership fail and you decide to go to small claims court for a faulty car claim against the dealership. In many cases, if the judge rules in your favour, you may also be able to recover the cost of the inspection as part of your compensation.

Attempting to Resolve the Issue Before Going to Court

Taking a car dealership to small claims court should be a last resort, pursued only after you’ve sent the required written notices and attempted to reach an amicable resolution. 

If efforts to resolve the issue with the dealership fail, you might wonder, Can I take a car dealership to small claims court? The answer is usually yes for straightforward cases involving claims under £10,000, provided you’ve taken the necessary steps to try to settle the dispute amicably first.

Here are the steps you should take when preparing to take a car dealership to small claims court:

1. Contact the car dealership and notify them of the fault: Ideally, do this within 30 days of purchase to ‘stop the clock’ and preserve your rights under the Consumer Rights Act, which entitles you to return the car back to the dealer if a fault emerges within that period. You should notify the dealership that you intend to invoke your right to reject and wish for a full refund of the amount you paid for the car, as well as compensation for any incurred costs, such as alternative transport to work. Keep written records of all communications with the car dealership.

2. Follow up with a Final Demand letter: If the car dealership doesn’t respond to your initial communications, send them a Final Demand letter that clearly outlines the facts of the case and the compensation you are asking for. Ensure that you include any supporting evidence of the vehicle fault, such as an independent mechanic’s review, and reference your rights under the Consumer Rights Act, providing a clear timeline for response, usually seven days

3. Prepare to go to court: If the car dealership does not respond to your Final Demand notice or responds with a refusal, you can send a Letter Before Action, which is required before starting a small claims court case. The Letter Before Action should clearly outline your intention to seek resolution through legal means. 

4. Filing at small claims court for a faulty car: Once these important steps have been taken, if your case is appropriate for small claims court, you can proceed with filing your claim. CaseCraft.AI makes it easier to file with small claims court. You can use the simple, secure platform to organise important documents, review court information, and get advice on managing your claim.

Understanding Your Legal Rights as a Consumer

As a consumer, you can reject a faulty car purchased from a car dealership within 30 days of purchase under the Consumer Rights Act (CRA). You can also require that a car dealership repair any vehicle fault that develops within six months of purchase. 

You can generally only proceed with a private car sale small claims court case if the description given by the private seller was misleading, and you can prove that the original car advertisement is for a vehicle significantly different from the car you received. Otherwise, a privately listed car is considered to have been bought “as seen”, and the seller is not liable to fix faults that develop or become known after purchase.

Your consumer rights are much better protected when you buy a car from a dealership than they are when you purchase from a private seller. That’s why it’s worth checking whether the dealer is accredited by The Motor Ombudsman or registered as an approved RAC dealer before you buy. This helps protect your rights and gives you access to third-party alternative dispute resolution if something goes wrong with the vehicle.

Preparing to Take the Car Dealership to Court

Before going to small claims court for car repairs or to request a refund, it is important that you gather evidence to support your claim. Supporting evidence can include photographs of visible faults or a report from an independent mechanic clearly outlining what’s wrong with the car. If you’re claiming for faulty repairs, include images showing poor workmanship and evidence that the issue remains unresolved or the job was left incomplete.

Once you’ve gathered your evidence, you must notify the dealership of your intent to seek restitution, providing the required notices and copies of your proof, along with a clear response deadline, typically seven days.

If your claim is complex or the total amount you are claiming is over £10,000, it is unlikely to be considered a small claims court car dealership case. Seek professional advice from an expert lawyer to help you bring your case to the appropriate court track.

 

Filing a Lawsuit Against the Car Dealership

If you are wondering, Can I take a car dealership to small claims court?the yes or no answer depends on how complex your claim is and the amount of compensation you are claiming. 

Should small claims court be the appropriate track, you can file a lawsuit against the car dealership online and track the progress of your case via CaseCraft.AI’s simple, secure platform. Here, you can see updates to your case, get advice, and set alerts for court updates – it makes managing a small claim much easier. 

Putting right problems with the repair work or servicing

If a car dealership has carried out servicing or repairs poorly, taken too long, or charged unreasonable fees, you have the right to claim compensation. You’re entitled to have substandard work corrected at no extra cost. If the original garage can’t fix the issue within a reasonable timeframe, you can claim back the cost of having the work completed properly by another garage.

You can also claim other reasonable losses or expenses caused by poor repair work or improper vehicle servicing. For instance, you may need to use alternative transport to get to work while your vehicle is in for repair. Make sure to retain evidence of losses and expenses and evidence of unsatisfactory work, such as an independent third-party mechanic report or a failed MOT.

Taking a car dealer to small claims court is easier with CaseCraft.AI. Our simple, secure platform keeps all your paperwork organised and alerts you to important court dates, while making it easier to file and manage your case – all without any need for prior legal knowledge. Don’t drown in files and risk missing mandated deadlines – give yourself the best chance at getting the compensation you deserve, with a little help from CaseCraft.AI. 

Case studies

Success stories

"CaseCraft AI will change the industry — it puts power back in the hands of individuals. No more costly lawyers or confusing paperwork. It’s fast, fair, and incredibly user-friendly."
Jessica H.

Tested by Sterling Law

“Really impressed with how smooth the system is. The interface is clean, and it just makes handling cases feel effortless. Everything is where you need it, without any unnecessary steps.”
Daniel K.

Tested by Sterling Law

“The platform is incredibly intuitive. I was able to start using it without any complicated training, and it’s made organising case documents much simpler.”
Edward M.

Tested by Sterling Law

CaseCraft AI is an advanced platform designed to simplify the small claims application process. We use cutting-edge AI technology to automate critical tasks such as document preparation, case tracking, and compliance management, ensuring efficiency and accuracy at every step. Whether you’re filing or responding to a claim, CaseCraft AI streamlines the process for greater accuracy and efficiency.

CaseCraft AI can handle a wide range of small claims, including unpaid debts, contract disputes, service agreement disputes, and property damage claims. The platform includes an eligibility check that guides you through the process, ensuring your claim meets the necessary legal requirements.

Yes, security is a top priority. We use enterprise-grade encryption and comply with UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 to ensure the confidentiality and security of all user data. Regular security audits and access controls further protect sensitive information.

AI-powered platform

Don’t Wait – Get
Started Today!

Take the first step toward a faster, easier small claims process with CaseCraft.AI.

Start Your Claim Now
Co-founder

Alexander Mints

Finance, operations and product development

Alexander has made significant contributions to the field of investment management, notably through his role in establishing EG Capital Advisors and spearheading its Emerging Markets Corporate High Yield investment strategy from its inception. His career is marked by a deep understanding of credit analysis, risk evaluation, and a hands-on approach to investment management, honed through extensive experience in the industry.

Previously holding key roles in reputable financial institutions, Alexander served as the Head of Analytics and Portfolio Manager at Alfa Capital’s Multi-Family Office Department. There, he applied his skills and comprehensive market knowledge to manage portfolios effectively, ensuring client satisfaction and investment success.

His career journey also includes a tenure at SDM Bank, where he worked as an Economist and Financial Supervision Specialist in the Risk Assessment Group.

Co-founder

Michael Iatsukha

Legal research and product development

Michael, a partner at, a Legal 500 law firm, Sterling Law and co-founder of AQLO, brings his expertise in civil litigation, corporate and commercial law to the forefront of legal technology and innovation.

His experience at Sterling Law, where he navigated clients through the complexities of litigation, is invaluable in informing the development and functionality of CaseCraft AI. Michael’s practical approach to legal challenges, focused on efficient and client-friendly solutions, is embedded into the core of CaseCraft AI, ensuring users receive not just technological convenience but also legally sound guidance.

Similarly, his involvement in AQLO, a testament to his innovative spirit and tech-forward thinking, complements his work at CaseCraft AI. His ability to merge legal proficiency with technological advancement is a cornerstone of his contribution to CaseCraft AI, making the platform a pioneering tool in legal tech.

Co-founder

Dmitry Bagrov

Technology oversight

Dmitry Bagrov led the establishment of DataArt UK and currently oversees all aspects of its operations, from sales to production and HR management.

In his time as a Managing Director, Dmitry has built DataArt UK into a fully-staffed provider of end-to-end solutions and has brought annual revenue from $2.4 million in 2009 to over $110 million in 2023. He has led teams to gain a range of clients, including Flutter, Apax Partners, Trainline, Coller Capital, Ocado Technology, British Gas, major UK banks and financial services firms.

With over thirty years’ experience across product and service development, delivery, sales and management, Dmitry’s 24 years with DataArt followed roles of project manager and developer in other companies.

Dmitry is a regular media commentator on business technology issues, such as digital strategy, digital transformation, innovation, and has been quoted in The Financial Times, The Times, The Guardian, TechWeekEurope, Vanilla+, Forbes, BBC and numerous other news outlets.

Dmitry holds an MBA from London Cass Business School.

Co-founder

Ruslan Kosarenko

Legal research, PR and marketing

Ruslan Kosarenko is a renowned UK immigration lawyer and Partner, recognized by Legal 500. He manages a team of 40 lawyers and is a visionary in immigration law, co-founding several platforms that are transforming the immigration process. These include Emigral, an immigration tech platform; AQLO, a legal and accounting tech platform for startups; talentvisa.uk, an immigration tech platform for talented individuals; Bug Free Immigration, an immigration and recruitment platform for high-ranking IT professionals; and the London Business Club.

As the Head of Immigration at Sterling Law, he has co-founded platforms like “Emigral” and “Talentvisa” revolutionizing the UK immigration process. His expertise covers High Net Worth applications, extradition, and human rights applications. He is known for being a ‘strategic problem solver.’

Ruslan has a strong commitment to integrating technology into immigration services, evident in his partnership with EMIGRAL.UK, focusing on AI-enhanced solutions to streamline the immigration process. His legal acumen is also demonstrated in significant cases like R (on the Application of Franco) v SSHD.

Advisor

Ed Crosse

Ed Crosse is a Commercial Disputes Partner at Simmons & Simmons LLP and a CEDR Accredited Mediator, with over 30 years’ experience representing clients across a wide range of sectors including Wholesale and Private Banking, Wealth Management, AMIF, Real Estate Finance, Health & Life Sciences, Defence, and Aviation. He has particular expertise in commercial and civil fraud claims arising from or into the UAE, Switzerland, and CIS countries. Ed is frequently instructed to conduct internal investigations involving financial services regulation and suspected corrupt payments.

Renowned for his meticulous and unrelenting approach to litigation, Ed is regarded as a “leave no stone unturned” advocate. He is known for his strategic, considered style—choosing precision over aggression and bringing clarity to complex disputes.

Ed has played a leading role in shaping litigation practice in England and Wales. As President of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) in 2016, he helped drive significant civil procedure reforms in the Business and Property Courts, including the Shorter and Flexible Trials Scheme (STS) and the Disclosure Pilot (now Practice Direction 57AD). In 2018, he was elected to the Council of the Law Society of England & Wales representing the City of London and serves on the City of London Law Society committee. He is a respected speaker and chair at legal industry events, regularly addressing both technical and strategic topics.

Recognised as a Tier 1 “Leading Partner” in Civil Fraud, Ed has been described by legal directories as “a star litigator”, “client-focused”, and “a highly experienced litigator with great judgement, who combines excellent knowledge of the law with a real understanding of the commercial drivers of cases.”

Ed qualified as a solicitor in 1997, having trained at Clifford Chance and practiced at a leading City firm before joining his current firm in 2012.

At CaseCraft.AI, Ed serves as a trusted Advisor, contributing across several critical areas:

  • Strategic Guidance: Providing expert advice on legal strategy to ensure the platform aligns with current legal standards and best practices.

  • Industry Insights: Offering a deep understanding of legal market trends, challenges, and opportunities to guide product development and positioning.

  • Network Expansion: Introducing CaseCraft.AI to key stakeholders, partners, and clients within the legal ecosystem.

  • Product Evaluation: Delivering thoughtful, practical feedback on the platform’s capabilities, identifying areas for refinement and innovation.

  • Mentorship: Supporting the founding team with seasoned insight, helping them navigate the legal tech landscape with clarity and confidence.